Editor’s note: The email boxes at WhitewaterWise and Fort Atkinson Online have been filling very quickly of late, and we are glad for the interactions. Following a story published Thursday, April 4, regarding a closed session to discuss the Whitewater city manager’s performance, we asked the city manager for any comments he might have regarding the council’s decisions. He sent us a reply Friday, April 5. Regarding our receipt of the response, WhitewaterWise regrets our oversight and its delay in publication, which follows. A link to the story about the council’s closed session, held April 4, and actions that followed, is here: https://whitewaterwise.com/council-city-attorney-to-work-with-city-manager-on-job-expectations/.

City Manager John Weidl, on Friday, April 5, responding to WhitewaterWise’s request by email for comments about decisions regarding his job performance made by the Whitewater Common Council during a closed session held earlier this month, offered the following statement:

As I understand, these were the motions coming out of closed session (Thursday, April 4) roughly directing the council president to work on the following:

1. Work with city attorney regarding job expectations and corresponding note for file.

2. Work with city attorney to change ordinance regarding city manager appointment of certain high level city officials. 

In light of the motion made by our Common Council related to expectations, it is important to recognize the fundamental principles of transparency, due process, and constructive dialogue that guide our work within the city’s administration. While it’s not uncommon for differing minority perspectives to emerge within any governing body, it is crucial that we adhere to established policies and procedures, particularly concerning performance evaluations.

The initiative to document concerns is a first step towards clarity and mutual understanding. Rest assured, I am committed to engaging with this process openly and constructively, ensuring that all perspectives are considered and due process is followed.

The recent feedback from both the Common Council and our dedicated staff highlights a shared vision for the future of our city—one where collaboration, respect, and positive leadership prevail over outdated methods of problem-solving that rely on fear or exclusion. It’s through our collective efforts, grounded in respect and constructive communication, that we will continue to build a thriving community for all residents.”

In response to the Common Council’s second motion to refine the process surrounding the appointment of high-level city officials, I am always committed to discussing changes that incorporate feedback from elected officials and ensure greater transparency. Nonetheless, it’s imperative to clarify that the authority to make appointments, terminations, and the creation of new positions will be exercised in strict accordance with State Statute 64.11. This statute designates the city manager as the chief executive officer with comprehensive executive and administrative powers, including the creation and discontinuation of minor administrative positions based on the city’s needs. 

Acknowledging the balance between our government branches is crucial for effective governance. I am committed to enhancing communication and collaboration with the Common Council related to appointments made by the city manager. Together, we’ll work within the framework of State Statute 64.11, ensuring our actions benefit the city and uphold our shared responsibilities. Through open dialogue and mutual respect, we’ll strive for the betterment of our community.

John S. Weidl

City Manager, City of Whitewater